Powered By Blogger

CANADIAN POLITICAL/SOCIOLOGICAL UNINTENTIONAL COMEDY

FLAG OF CANADA

FLAG OF CANADA
FLAG OF CANADA
THE MAPLE LEAF FOREVER - SECONDARY ANTHEM

GRIEVING AGED CANADIAN TEDDY BEAR

GRIEVING AGED CANADIAN TEDDY BEAR

GRIEVING AGED CANADIAN TEDDY BEAR - 12 POSTS

AUTUMN LEAVES - HIGH PARK

GORDON LIGHTFOOT: A MINOR BALLAD

GORDON LIGHTFOOT: A MINOR BALLAD

Political Observations - Robin Williams

Politicians are a lot like diapers – they should be changed frequently and for the same reason”.
- Robin Williams

MAN IS BY NATURE, A POLITICAL ANIMAL

ONTARIO NEANERHTAL VOTER

EX-GAYS BEING HARASSED BY GAYS!

EX-GAYS BEING HARASSED BY GAYS! http://www.voiceofthevoiceless.info/about-us/

URGENT FEARS TO COMPLACENT CANADIANS & HE'S BACK

Wednesday 15 September 2010

CHRISTOPHOBIA - PERSECUTION UNDER THE HYPOCRISY OF ‘INTOLERANCE’


 
A secular friend (a person of colour/African Canadian) was angered and grieved with the seeming non-responses of high-profile African-Canadian (in his own words) 'Uncle Toms' and 'Aunt Jemimas' regarding the brazenness of the homosexual/lesbian community daring to identify with persons of colour and other visible minorities.

To All Ethical People of All Sexuality,

            To clarify to the reader, I believe in live and let live. I am against wanton discrimination against anyone (whether homosexual or heterosexual).
            I am in philosophical solidarity with all ethical and just people against the persecution of homosexuals in concentration camps during the Nazi reign of terror in Europe during WW2. Homosexuals were forced to wear the pink triangle to distinguish themselves from other perceived Nazi named inferior sub-humans.             
            I believe it is none of anyone's business who one is. However, I believe that it is none of one's business telling/broadcasting who they are - let alone having a week (Gay Pride Week Toronto) and/or a day (Gay Pride Day Parade Toronto) about one's personal sexuality.              
            That being stated, it is dangerous with far-reaching sociological negative aftermaths that the Canadian Homosexual/Lesbian Community have gone too far in crossing the line in being able to be allowed same-sex marriage (the word: marriage has religious connotations) with full 'spousal' rights and to adopt children but it is more ominous that the persecuted have become the persecutors through the militant gay agenda, as follows on this web site: www.frontline.org.za/articles/Christophobia.htm and other venues
            To reiterate, Geoffrey, a student at UCLA and regular Rod 2.0 reader, joined the massive protest outside the Temple of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Westwood. Geoffrey was called the n-word at least twice.
            It was like being at a Klan rally except the Klansmen were wearing Abercrombie polos and Birkenstocks. YOU N*GG*R, one man shouted at me. If your people want to call me a F*GG*T, I will call you a n*gg*r. Someone else said same thing to me on the next block near the temple...me and my friend were walking, he is also gay but Korean, and a young WeHo clone said after last night the n*gg*rs better not come to West Hollywood if they knew what was BEST for them.

JUDICIAL PERSECUTION            
            In April 1996, Scott Brockie and his family's Toronto Ontario (Canada) printing business, Imaging Excellence, were approached with an order for letterhead, envelopes and business cards for the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives. Mr. Brockie, who is a Christian, refused to accept the order as it contravened his religious conscience to assist an organization's activities that directly promoted homosexuality, which he believed to be a sin. Two months later, a representative from the Archives filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission, asserting that Mr. Brockie had denied the individual commercial services based on the man's sexual orientation. In September 1999, Mr. Brockie and Imaging Excellence were found guilty of what was called discriminatory conduct. He was forced to pay a penalty to the Archives of $5,000 and to provide the printing services he had originally refused; in other words, to perform an act that he regarded as being unethical or immoral. In addition, left-hand click on: www.theinterim.com/2002/july/02brockie (different condensed article but same theme). Interesting and disturbing, a Muslim lawyer was approached by EGALE (Equality For Gays and Lesbians Everywhere), the prominent gay rights advocacy group, and was asked to act for them in bringing a constitutional challenge to some legislation which denies a benefit to same-sex couples. The lawyer refuses, citing his religious belief that the Koran states that same-sex relationships are contrary to the law of Allah. EGALE never brought this Muslim lawyer to trial for his ‘human rights’ violation. Scott Brockie challenged the ruling to the Ontario Court of Appeals and was successful but EGALE took this to the Ontario Supreme Court which overturned the Ontario Court of Appeals ruling. Alas Scott Brockie is forced to take this the Canadian Supreme Court even though he has a business to run.           
            In Sweden, Pastor Ake Green was sentenced to a month in prison for having offended homosexuals in a sermon. Pastor Green is in his 70’s. When a reporter asked, “What about the Pastor’s rights”? The prosecutor replied, “When he started reading Bible verses about homosexuality, he crossed the line”.              
            Slovakia issued a protest against this heavy handed prison sentence for the pastor in Sweden, saying that this was an example of how “left-wing liberal ideology was trying to introduce tyranny and misuse the (European Union)” to silence freedom of expression. “In Europe, people are starting to be jailed for saying what they think."
            Hugh Owens, in Canada, was prosecuted for placing a small ad in his local newspaper in response to all, that he had been forced to observe during Homosexual Pride Week. His advert listed four Scripture references (Romans 1, Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10) next to an equal sign and a drawing depicting two men holding hands, superimposed over the line drawing with the universal red circle with a line through it, effectively summarizing the Scriptures listed. For that “crime,” Owen was fined $4,500. The newspaper was also fined. So, in Canada, even listing Bible verses can be construed as a “hate crime!”            
            Dr. James Dobson’s “Focus on the Family” must now edit their Canadian radio programs to remove anything that might be deemed critical of homosexuality, including Bible verses on the subject, and information like the fact that, according to the Centre for Disease Control, the majority of the cases of AIDS in the US are men who engage in homosexual sex.
            In New Zealand, two Christian videos that questioned safe sex slogans and exposed the link between AIDS and homosexual behaviour were outlawed by the New Zealand parliament.
            When retired air force officer, Enoch Lawrence, in response to a homosexual poster the company had placed near his cubicle, placed a Bible verse, and a bumper sticker that read: “Marriage: One Man One Woman” in his own work cubicle, he was fired by Hewlett-Packard. While a “Pagan Pride Festival” flyer was posted in the break room of Hewlett-Packard, Lawrence’s Pro-Marriage bumper sticker was forbidden.             
            The head of the Central British Columbia Public Health Board, Chris Kempling, with a PHD in psychology, was suspended from his teaching job at the local high school for writing a letter to the editor of his local newspaper. He stated that homosexuality was not a genetic orientation, that homosexual sex was often unhealthy and promiscuous and that homosexuals could become straight. The judge pronounced Kempling a “bigot.” Although Kempling was never accused of any discriminatory act, he was condemned for having wrong thoughts. 
            Dianne Haskett, the Mayor of London, Ontario, Canada, was fined $10,000 for refusing to proclaim a “Gay Pride Weekend.” After she lost her case in Canada’s courts, she resigned as mayor rather than to be forced to proclaim the event - just 3 weeks before Election Day. (However, the voters re-elected her with an overwhelming 64% of the vote).  
            An elderly Englishman, Harry Hammond, was heckled, ridiculed and attacked on the street for holding a sign that read: “Stop immorality. Stop homosexuality. Stop lesbianism.” He was assaulted and knocked to the ground, but when the police showed up they arrested the victim of the assault! He was prosecuted for the opinion he expressed.             
            When a local school in Canada started handing out copies of the Koran and announced the policy of setting aside a room for Muslim students to pray during school hours, Pastor Mark Harding objected. Pointing out that Christian, Jewish and Buddhist children were not afforded similar opportunities, Harding was prosecuted. Despite Pastor Harding’s publicly stating his love for Muslims and commitment to evangelising his Muslim neighbours, he received more than 3,000 hate filled calls, many of them death threats. ‘Some people in the courtroom motioned by running their finger across their neck from ear to ear. Entering the court, Harding had to pass through crowds of Muslims chanting: “Infidel you will burn in Hell!” However, as they were not prosecuted, these death threats were apparently not considered “hate speech.”
            Harding reported receiving a call from someone, identifying himself as from Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam group, who told him that: “They were going to break my legs.” Other calls threatened various amputations and mutilations. Yet, it was Pastor Harding who was convicted of having “willfully promoted hatred” and required to undergo 2 years probation and 340 hours of “community service” at the Islamic Society of North America, where he was forced to go through Islamic “re-education.”

FREEDOM IS AT RISK             
            Janet Folger, in The Criminalization of Christianity states: “Christians are singled out, labelled, fined, interrogated, humiliated, indoctrinated, fired, ordered to attend re-education programmes and sent to jail for expressing Biblical views…this battle is for truth and freedom. And we are losing by default… If we stay silent on controversial issues, like the slaughter of more than 45 million American children…no one will be offended… We work very hard to present a sensitive, positive Christianity to seekers who don’t like hearing about stuff like obedience and a place called Hell. ‘All we need is love’ has replaced ‘Onward Christian Soldiers’ as our anthem. Love is critical, of course, but so is Truth. The Bible says that God is love, but also that He is Holy… Unless we embrace Him as Lord, we will face Him as Judge. Keep in mind that Jesus talked more about Hell than He did about Heaven… and if we make Him Lord, we have to actually do what He says…He commanded us: “Rescue those who are unjustly sentenced to death; don’t stand back and let them die” Proverbs 24:11… “Open your mouth for the speechless, in the cause of all who are appointed to die” Proverbs 31:8… “Thou shalt not kill”…Exodus 20:17 “If you love Me you will keep My commandments” John 14:15… “Faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action is dead.” James 2:17 “Your actions are what you believe. Everything else is just religious talk… if you want to be free to speak what you believe in your church, in your work place, in your community, you are going to have to get off the side lines and into the game…but this is more than just a game. It’s a battle for our freedom. Yes, we have the right to remain silent, but if we use it much longer, we may hear those words being read to us just before we see the inside of a prison cell.”

RIDICULE AND NAME CALLING             
            One tactic often used to silence Christians is ridicule. This encompasses everything from insults and name calling to character assassination.              
            Given the prevailing dogma of “tolerance” it is extraordinary to note the abusive terminology published against Christians.             
            One article in the Washington Post described Christians as “largely poor, uneducated and easy to lead.” Imagine describing any other group of people in that way in the press!            
            Ted Turner, the former owner of CNN, described Christians as “bozos” and Christianity as “a religion for losers.” Again, imagine any prominent figure describing the adherents of any other religion in such words.             
            Mel Gibson was one of Hollywood’s greatest stars, popular and respected - until he wanted to make a movie about the sufferings of Christ. No one in Hollywood was willing to finance or distribute it. Mel Gibson began being described as “a wacko”,”crazy”, “a real nut case”, and worse. Interestingly enough, The Passion of the Christ, in terms of box-office sales, became one of the top ten most successful films of all time - despite the extraordinary Hollywood and news media campaign against it. Despite Christianity being based on the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ to love one another, love our neighbours, love our enemies, return good for evil, to forgive and be merciful, Christians are frequently referred to in the most negative terms: “The forces of genuine evil, evil, genuine evil;”“Their religion is so narrow, and it is so mean, and it’s so ugly…”            
            Roseanne Barr publicly exclaimed: “You know what else I can’t stand, is them people that are anti-abortion. F – Them; I hate them. They’re horrible; they’re hideous people. They’re ugly, old, geeky, hideous men… they just don’t want nobody to have an abortion…”            
            Syndicated radio host, Howard Stern, after vehemently arguing for abortion, responded to a pro-life caller in these words: “You’re an idiot. I can’t stand dumb people. If I were president, I would have you gassed. I would march you into the ovens!” Can one imagine any radio host being able to refer to Muslims, Jews or any other group with such words!            
            At a Grateful Dead concert, musician Bob Weir announced to a crowd of 30,000: “Can I hear everyone say, ‘F-the Christian Right?”

ANTI-CHRISTIAN PREJUDICE             
            “If they are Christians, you can hate them. You can ridicule them, and before you silence them make sure you blame them for everything you don’t like. Pick a Christian, any Christian. And, hey, why not start at the top? There are now more than 50 books bashing (President) Bush”
            Hypocritically, the California National Organisation of Women (www.canow.org) and NOW - National Organization of Women (www.now.org) did not show any solidarity with Miss California, Carrie Prejean being insulted by Perez Hilton with anti-women sexist 'b' words and 'c' words on Facebook. Are we to believe that so-called women rights advocates are ethical and have integrity insofar in excluding evangelical Christian women when their rights are trampled by the other sex -whether straight or gay in any situation?

HOMOSEXUAL BIAS
            Former Clinton White House Spokesman, Mike McCurry, declared that anyone who believed what the Bible had to say about homosexuality was “backward thinking.” Can you imagine him saying that about people who believed the Koran?             
            The Criminalisation of Christianity observes that while there were 13,500 stories on the murder of Matthew Shepard, who was a homosexual, there were only 632 stories on the brutal murder of 13 year old Jesse Dirkhising by homosexual assailants. The people who killed Matthew Shepard later confirmed that they didn’t do it out of any animosity for his sexual behaviour – they killed him for money for drugs. Both killers attacked Shepard for robbery, it had nothing to do with his homosexuality. Yet there was massive newspaper and TV coverage of the Shepard case, two major Hollywood specials, three TV movies and a play, all depicting Shepard as a victim of an anti-homosexual hate crime. However, people like Jesse Dirkhising, who was bound, gagged and brutally sodomised, then smothered to death, by homosexual assailants failed to receive any such media coverage. Similarly, the murder of Mary Stachowicz, a 51 year old wife, and mother of 4, who was murdered by a 19 year old homosexual, Nicholas Gutierrez, for witnessing to him and suggesting that he could change his lifestyle, was ignored by most newspapers. This mother - who was described as a deeply compassionate church member and soft-spoken - was “punched, kicked, stabbed and strangled to death.” But that wasn’t considered a hate crime.

HATRED AND BLASPHEMY             
            Folger points out that while pro-family leaders repeatedly condemned the murder of Shepard, the homosexual community never condemned this horrific murder. Posted on the ACLU On Line Forum, were these comments: “I really don’t feel sorry for her. She paid a very steep price for being an arrogant religious fascist.” And “quite frankly, if anyone in this case was being persecuted it was Mr. Gutierrez.” Posted on YAHOO were these comments: “Maybe (Stachowicz’s murder) will strike fear in the hearts of a few fundamentalists…Where do I send a cheque for (Gutierrez’s) defense fund!”; “the B- had it coming to her. I’m glad he killed her…the B- deserved to die!” So tolerance does not seem to apply toward Pro-Life, Pro-Family Christians. Nor does any amount of venom poured out against Christians seem to be worthy of the designation “hate speech.” American Christians have endured all kinds of harassment and threats from militant homosexuals. ACT UP (AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power) founder, Eric Pollard, threatened Pro-Family leaders: “I shall torture you during the day time, and will keep you from a peaceful sleep at night.” In Madison, Wisconsin, 400 homosexual activists stormed Trinity Evangelical Fellowship Church shouting obscenities inside the church for nearly an hour, while some of the protesters urinated and defecated on the church floor. Hundreds of others banged on the walls and windows with rocks and trash can lids, shouting: “Crush the Christians!” and “Bring back the lions!” ACT UP member, Michael Petrelis, publicly stated: “We should have shut down the subway and burned down City Hall. I think rioting is a valid tactic and should be tried…if some one took out (former Congressman) Jesse Helms or William Dannemeyer…I will be the first to stand up and applaud.” At St. Patrick’s Cathedral, ACT UP homosexual activists stormed the church, screamed obscenities and stomped on communion bread, urinating in the church. Posters with vile curses against the Pro-Life pastor and the church predominated. ACT UP protesters simulated various perversions on the altar, and swarmed around congregants pelting them with condoms and shouting and threatening them.

ATTACKING THE CHURCH             
            In their book When the Wicked Seize a City, Chuck and Donna McIlhenny, described what happened after the San Francisco Presbyterian Church fired a homosexual organist. “Rocks, beer bottles, beer cans were thrown through the church windows on many occasions. Swastikas were carved in the church doors and drawn on our house. A window in our car was smashed out. Graffiti was spray painted all over the church, house and sidewalk. Anti-Christian, Pro-homosexual leaflets were scattered around the neighbourhood, calling us Nazis, bigots, anti-gay, etc. Demonstrators would come to our Sunday services and disrupt the worship…one man came pounding and spitting on our front door in the middle of the night, screaming: ‘We’re going to get you McIlhenny – we’re going to kill you politically!’ We were verbally threatened outside the house on the way to the car. There were daily – 24 hours per day – telephone calls. It began with screaming and obscenities. They graduated in the phone calls to describing our children…and what sexually deviant behaviour was to be practiced on the children before killing them…Then…someone actually attempted to follow through with their threats to kill us by fire bombing the house while the children were asleep inside.”

BLOOD TERRORISM             
            One radical gay activist, Robert Schwab, suggested: “If AIDS research money is not forthcoming at a certain level by a certain date, all gay males should give blood. Whatever action is required to get national attention is valid. If that includes blood terrorism, so be it.” Doug Herman of Pure Revolution lost his wife and baby to “blood terrorism.” Now he travels America speaking about Purity. Folger writes: “And let me assure you, homosexual activists attack him. You would think that killing his wife and daughter would have been enough.”

DIAGNOSIS BY INTIMIDATION             
            The New York Academy of Medicine issued a Report on Homosexuality in 1963, which stated: “Homosexuality is indeed an illness. The homosexual is an emotionally disturbed individual who has not acquired the normal capacity to develop satisfying heterosexual relations.” However, in 1973, the American Psychiatric Association voted to strike homosexuality from the official list of Psychiatric Illnesses. Not because of any new scientific revelations, nor even from any consensus within the scientific community, but because of threats and intimidation. Dr. Jeffery Satimoveo, in Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, wrote: “Homosexual activists planned a systematic effort to disrupt the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.” Protesters broke into the meeting of APA members and grabbed the microphone and proclaimed: “Psychiatry is the enemy incarnate. Psychiatry has waged a relentless war of extermination against us. You may take this as a declaration of war against you…we are rejecting you all…” The committee later voted that maybe homosexual behaviour was not a sign of psychiatric disorder after all. At the 1973 APA Convention, dissenters were allowed only 15 minutes to discuss 70 years of psychiatric research that contradicted it, before the hijacked vote was formally applied to the full membership. Although 69% of psychiatrists disagreed with the vote and still considered homosexuality a disorder, intimidation tactics had succeeded in forcing the APA to reverse their official position. In 1994, activists tried to make it illegal for practitioners to give therapy aimed at helping homosexuals change. Although this attempt failed to secure a majority vote, a few years ago, the APA published a study favourable to Pedophilia.

PERSECUTED FOR PROTECTING
            In recent years, the Boy Scouts of America have come under relentless attack for not allowing self-described homosexual activists to become Scout leaders. As a result of attempting to protect the children who had been entrusted to them, the Boy Scouts have been kicked out of parks, schools and public forums, denied funding by cities and counties. So far, despite being underfunded, ostracized, thrown out and left out, they have stood up against the ridicule, the assaults, the censorship and the law suits. And all that because they want to teach young boys honesty, courage, hard work, respect, patriotism and positive values.

CENSORSHIP IN THE CLASSROOM             
            When 5 year old Antonio Peck was told to make a poster on How to Save the World, he drew a picture of Jesus and wrote: “The only way to save our world.” His teacher told him that this was: “Unacceptable!” When Craig Cunningham of the Genocide Awareness Project set up a display at the University of Miami depicting various forms of Genocide throughout history, some students tried to cut, mangle and destroy them. Reason? He had included pictures of the Abortion Holocaust. A quote from the University paper concerning his Genocide Awareness Project: “Whoever these people are, they should be shot.” So whatever happened to freedom of speech on campus? Imagine some Christian writing something like that about, for example, a homosexual group? Why, that would be a hate crime!

PREFERRING PAGANISM             
            The Mayor of San Jose justified spending $500,000 of public money to construct a statue of the Aztec god, Quetzalcoatl, because the Aztec religion contained: “those elements that seek to elevate the human consciousness to a higher plane.” The fact that this very same Aztec religion marched hundreds of thousands of slaves to the top of their pyramid like temples, to have their still-beating hearts ripped out of their chests with flint knives, hardly seems to justify such praise. Yet at the same time as this tax funded Aztec idol was being erected, the San Jose Parks Board decided to remove a Nativity scene from the same park. (A flood of protests to the City Hall managed to reverse this incredible decision.) While GOOGLE takes ads for all kinds of XXX pornographic films and sites, GOOGLE recently banned an advertisement from a Christian Organisation, Stand To Reason, because the group’s website contained articles saying what the Bible says about homosexuality! Various judges nominated in the USA, have been opposed by liberals because: “His children are home-schooled”; “They are leaders in the Boy Scouts” and “They teach Sunday school”!
AN APPEAL TO THE NON-POLITICIZED ETHICALLY-MINDED MEMBERS OF GAY COMMUNITIES             
            Perhaps, the True Church should at least apologize to the gay community for miscommunication rather than its stance regarding homosexuality.              
            To open dialogue with the Gay Community - rather than using non-diplomatic and/or inflammatory tags such as ‘choice’, ‘lifestyle’, 'biological', and/or ‘who one is’ - a neutral term as sexual orientation would be conciliatory for positive communication in bridging gaps.
            The non-politicized ethically-minded gay community need to be open that bigotry and hatred is not only exclusive among the heterosexual community but also among the homosexual community.
            For the homosexual/heterosexual communities, is there no discernment among any of you that there are negative, unnatural, and evil nuances that permeate homosexual orientation through various Gay Pride parades? For example, because the feminist lesbian community did not tolerate sexual exploitation in the porn industry, how can sexual exploitation are tolerated through various Gay Pride parades and hypocritically from sexually exploitative magazines such as On Our Backs? In addition, it is hypocritical to protest against Hooters operating in local neighbourhoods and then, tolerate women exposing their breasts during Dyke March.
            For the Gay Community, tolerance should be extended for former homosexuals and lesbians in your community for whatever reasons, desire and/or became heterosexual.              
            In conclusion, may this small olive branch composition in this post extend to some peace and reconciliation?

You’re in all our mutually best interests,
Mike Researcher       
Mike Researcher
coloured leaves

Monday 9 August 2010

THE TRUE SPIRIT OF THE ONTARIO 'PRESS COUNCIL'

PASSING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LEGISLATION IS A VIOLATION OF MULTICULTURALISM AND ETHNICITY! (2004 EDITION + 2 EXTRA PICTURES)

RUINS OF SODOM - THIS COULD BE CANADA!
"It is an affront to African-Americans to say having past generations being prevented from taking a drink from a public water fountain or being sprayed down by fire hoses in a public park was on par to laws preventing a man from marrying another man. The comparison is shameful.
Civil rights leaders strongly reject this assertion. Rev. Jessie Jackson explains, Gays were never called three-fifths of a person in the Constitution...and they did not require the Voting Rights Act to have the right to vote".
Passing Same-sex Marriage Legislation Is a Violation of Multiculturalism and Ethnicity!

ATTN: The Right Honourable Paul Martin, Prime Minister:
              House of Commons
              Ottawa ON K1A 0A6
              Tel: (613) 992 - 4211, Fax: (613) 941 - 6900
              E-mail: Martin.P@parl.gc.ca Website: www.parl.gc.ca

Mr. Prime Minister,

              I urge you to reconsider passing the Same-Sex Marriage bill for this bill, if passed, will fragment and destabilise Canadian society. Possibly, there is a naivety involving the negative ramifications if this bill implemented as presently defined.
              Forgive me of this very lengthy e-mail but this issue requires rational and/or analytical responses. As a credibility factor, I may post this email on a website. Here are my concerns in sections:

IN 1968 WHEN HOMOSEXUALITY WAS DECRIMINALISED, A MAJORITY OF CANADIANS BELIEVED THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ENOUGH!
              This does not need to be dwelt on.
              Because monitoring homosexual activities was draining the resources of law enforcers in Canadian cities, a majority of Canadians agreed with the legislation, of then, Justice Minister: Pierre Elliott Trudeau to decriminalise homosexuality on the premise that: "The state has no business in the nation's bedrooms." This was in the context that there would be no further pro-homosexual legislation. Obviously, everything has gone amok!

PARADOXICALLY, MARRIAGE EQUALITY TO SAME-SEX COUPLES IS BIGOTED AND A SUBLIMINAL VIOLATION OF MULTICULTURALISM!
              There is a disturbing manipulative agenda by the Gay Community to compare themselves to ethnic minorities, even those of colour. All objective scientific and anthropological evidences do not support the Gay community using this bigoted bias. 
              For gays and lesbians to advocate the same status as in ethnic minorities - is subliminal bigotry and prejudice!!! To pass the same-sex marriage legislation is tantamount to the same thing!
              Ironically, to allow for 'equal' rights for gays and lesbians - also denigrates ethnic minorities especially people of colour. To my perceptions, this is a subliminal form of bigotry and racism!!!

              My perceptions in numerical form are:
1.   Homosexuality is a lifestyle! Not a definition of who one is! To advocate this as 'scientific' - borders on quackery!
2.   Proofs that homosexuality is a lifestyle - there are ex-gays and ex-lesbians, albeit sometimes difficult, who have came out of that deviation through secular-psychological and spiritual organisations such as New Directions, Rainbow Ministries, and Exodus etc. A case in point, one of the most famous ex-homosexuals: Actor: Anthony Perkins undergone successful therapy to control his homosexuality and married Berry Berenson (mother of actor: Oz Perkins whose genetic father was Anthony). Unfortunately, Anthony Perkins died of pneumonia in 1992 complicated by AIDS because of his former lifestyle. If same-sex marriage legislation passes, this denigrates the fine work that lifestyle-change organisations are doing as cited. ‘Another form of bigotry and prejudice!
3.   If same-sex marriage legislation is passed, how than does the law and/or legislation make sense regarding sexual deviation especially bisexuality? Remember, the constitution defines marriage between a man and a woman. It doesn't state what their physical and/or their health status are. Do bisexuals have the right to marry a man and a woman? Isn’t this off-the-wall form of polygamy? How about Hermaphrodites (no fault of their own) - who are they allowed to marry? How about Necrophiliacs - allowable marriage between a living and dead couple? For that matter, what constitutional limits prevent someone in marrying an inflatable sex doll?
4.   For the sake of National Health Care priorities, despite former MP: Sheila Copp’s accusations that you (Prime Minister: Paul Martin) intend the scrap and/or ‘amend’ the Canada Health Care system if same-sex marriage passes, wouldn’t there be an increase of AIDS and other sexually-transmitted homosexual-related diseases thus further straining the health care system especially in relationship of other sicknesses consigned to certain ethnic minorities that eventually could be made less of a priority? My contextual concerns are that abortion-on-demand (at present, this is helping to cause the median age increase, leading to the graying of Canada ) and AIDS-HIV seems to be given more priority in some of the provinces over basic necessities such as birth encouragement, eye care and needful chiropractic treatments.
5.   Advocating equal rights for same-sex couples is international bigotry against developing nation’s cultures such as in Africa where there is not any African local dialects and/or word for ‘homosexual’. In addition, this is an offence to the Sikh community and/or other ethnic communities who have cultural and religious bans pertaining to homosexuality implemented in their social structure.
6.   Some Canadian ethnic minority Canadians now suspect that multiculturalism and racial equality platforms advocated by previous Federal governments and yours are only appendages for the main platform - subliminal, systematic, Machiavellian extension of gay rights after decriminalisation in 1968.
       
THE MANIPULATIVE QUACKERY SCIENCE IN SUPPORTING HOMOSEXUALITY AS NORMAL AND/OR GENETIC!
              Here is a profound objective article that further clarifies my same-sex marriage concerns.

Good afternoon,
              I am Dr. Tom Finn, a voter from Southington. I am voicing my opposition to proposed bills seeking to create same-sex marriage or unions.
              As a husband, father of three children and a psychologist in clinical practice - my concern for this bill is that it will lead us to lose focus on the broader issue of what is good for our society, and for our children. The family has always been centred in the marriage of a man and woman dedicated to a lifetime of love and to the rearing of children and this is not by chance ... it is because it is what works best. This is not in any way intended to de-value the single-parent family like the one I grew up in, or any other family, rather it is to say that one man and one woman in marriage between has always been the cornerstone of our culture. I am often uncomfortable addressing these difficult issues as I am in opposition to the deeply held cause of others and I appreciate the way these hearings has been conducted in such respectful fashion. I, too, believe in the dignity of all human persons, regardless of how they live their lives and agree that all persons, whether their sexual behaviour is heterosexual or homosexual, deserve respect and that no one's rights under the Constitution should ever be denied. However, I do disagree with the proposed re-definition of marriage because to endorse this would contribute to further struggles of family life in our society. Today I would like to address two of the many assumptions central to our discussions. The first assumption is that sexual orientation and sexual behaviour is genetic, inherited, unchangeable and widespread. In other words, it is an "innate" characteristic. The root of this assumption is reflected in this statement from the book The Homosexualization of America:
              "The greatest single victory of the gay movement ... has been to shift the debate from behaviour to identity.
              Thus forcing opponents into a position where they can be seen as attacking civil rights of homosexual citizens. 1
              This shift of the "debate from behaviour to identity" encouraged people to believe that anyone living a homosexual Lifestyle did not choose to do so, rather, they did so because they were "born that way” or, in other words, that there was a genetic or biological cause for homosexuality. This belief was created primarily in the early 1990's with media reports of such research discoveries. Since that time, these proclaimed discoveries have been invalidated and disproved, and since I have provided you with detail that is more specific concerning this research in my written testimony, let me read you the words of the original researchers themselves:
1 ...there is no way of telling whether those" structural (brain) differences are the cause of people's sexual behaviour or the consequence or none of the above.
2 Sexuality is greatly influenced by environment and that the role of genetics is, in the end, limited"
3...homosexuality is "culturally transmitted, not inherited.
4 These conclusions have been supported by other studies in the later 1990's. 5,6,7
As for whether people can change their sexual orientation and lifestyle research supporting the successful leaving of a homosexual lifestyle has existed for many decades. 8 9,10,11,12,13, 4,15,16 More recent studies, 17,18 have added to the knowledge that, although certainly difficult, some men and women who have identified themselves as gay and lesbian are able to discontinue such lifestyles. 19 In terms of numbers, most activists want us to believe that 10-15% of the population is homosexual. This number is derived from the publications of Alfred Kinsey over 50 years ago, which have been widely challenged and proven false. More recent estimates in terms of the number at 1-2%, 20 In addition, the number of Connecticut households occupied by "same-sex partners" is less that 6/10 of 1%. 21 so, is this assumption accurate that homosexuality is inherited/genetic, unchangeable and widespread? The answer is no. The consensus of scientists is that homosexuality is not biologically based - rather it is socially influenced. 22,23,24
The second assumption we need to address is that children raised by same-sex couples are no different from children raised by a mother and father. This has not been proven. This assumption has come to the forefront of the debate as the American Academy of Paediatrics recently wrote: "A growing body of scientific literature demonstrates that children who grow up with 1 or 2 gay and/or lesbian parents fare as well in emotional, cognitive, social and sexual functioning as do children whose parents are heterosexual." 25
If we closely evaluate this "body of scientific literature," it does not support A.A.P.'s position. Most importantly, most of the research on which such claims are based does not compare children reared in same-sex homes to children reared by both a mother and father. They usually compare same-sex homes to single parent, heterosexual homes. Secondly, the studies cited are some of the worst examples of scientifically invalid, agenda-driven research imaginable and the authors of these studies,
Page 2
themselves, state in the body of their publications that the research is so poorly designed with small samples, lack of random sampling, bias on the part of the subjects, etc., that valid conclusions cannot be established 26,27
              As an example: "A further objection to the findings lies in the nature of the samples studied. Both groups were volunteers obtained through gay and single-parent magazines and associations. Obviously, these do not constitute random samples, and it is not possible to know what biases are involved in the method of sample selection." (Susan Golombotz)
              A broader, more valid "body of scientific literature" tells us that children will have much healthier lives if they grow up in a home with both a mother and father present. Specifically, kids who live with mom and dad: -are generally better off academically, financially, emotionally, socially and behaviourally and have better health-delay sex longer and receive support that is more parental -have a mom who provides emotional and physical nurturance and dad who helps develop positive character traits 28, 29, 30, 31, 32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40
              Certainly, no one would conclude that a child, who grows up in a single-parent home, will be unable to thrive. Thanks to the dedication and sacrifice of his or her mom or dad, wonderful growth can occur, but, as a whole, the challenges of Single parenting are many and kids who grow up in single parent families are more likely to live in poverty, 41 experience physical abuse and neglect, 42 have a greater risk of injury, health problems, repeating a grade or being expelled and a greater likelihood to be treated for emotional and behavioural problems. 43 Since the research usually cited to support same-sex parenting compares kids raised in gay or lesbian homes to homes without a mother and father present and argues that they are no different, then logic holds that children raised by same-sex couples are subject to the same increased risks as children raised without both mom and dad in the home.
              Additionally, research also shows that many gay and lesbian homes are different in other important ways, which place children at risk. Conclusions from these studies show an increased risk in the home for: significant levels of promiscuity that do not model monogamy as the norm 44, 45, 46 while most married heterosexual couples remain faithful over their lifetime 47,48-and an increased risk of the following bacterial and parasitical STDs including AIDS. 49,50,51 violence 52 mental health problems and suicide 53,54 substance abuse 55,56 sexual identity confusion including increased homosexual behaviour 57,58,59,60,61,62,63 incest 64,65 shorter parental life span 66
              If same-sex marriage is created, adoption and foster-care placements into same-sex homes would place children in settings vulnerable to the above influences and risks. Contrary to what the A.A.P. may imply, children are at greater risk if they are raised outside of a home in which both a mother and father are present.

SUMMARY
              In summary, the assumptions behind the same-sex union agenda are false and unfounded. The health and well being of children, of adults and of society depend on the nurturing power of a family centred in one man and one woman in a life-long, faithful, and fruitful marriage. I believe that our laws need to respond to the needs of our society in a way that fulfills a positive purpose and our State has a need for families, which provide the stability and nurturance necessary for the well being of our children. I oppose the re-definition of marriage in which the same-sex marriage movement appears more concerned with placing the desires of same-sex couples ahead of the intrinsic right of every child to the healthiest family environment possible: that provided by a man and women in marriage.
              Contrary to some opinions, love does not make a family. Love, certainly, is one component of a healthy family, but to say, that Love makes a family places the well being of children into the hands of subjective emotions and standards. I would offer, instead, that based on centuries of experience and valid research, that only when a man and woman lovingly commit to a lifetime of fidelity, responsibility and hard work are the best interests of children and society served. I hope that we will be able to honour and preserve marriage as the faithful union of one man and one woman.
Page 3

REFERENCES
1. Altman, D., The Homosexualization of America , (SL Martin's Press, 1982).
2. Levay, S., "A Difference in Hypothalamic Structure Between Heterosexual and Homosexual Men," Science, 1991, 10341037.
3. Pillard, R., quoted in "Gay Gene Fades in Relative Importance," Boston Globe, 2-7-99 .
4. Hamer, D. and Copeland, P., Living with Our Genes: Why They Matter More Than You Think. (New York:Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, 1998.)
5. Rice, G., et al., Male Homosexuality: Absence of Linkage to Microsatellite Markers at Xq28," Science, 1999,665-667.
6. Rice, G., et al., Ibid.
7. Balaban, E., "Gay Genes Revisited: Doubts Arise Over Research on the Biology of Homosexuality," Scientific American, Nov., 1995, 26.
8. Freud, A., "Some clinical Remarks Concerning the Treatment of Male Homosexuality," International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 30, 195.
9. Ovesy, L., Homosexuality and Pseudohomosexuality, (New York: Science House, 1969).
10. Sdhwartz, M. and Masters, W. "The Masters and Johnson Treatment Program for Dissatisfied Homosexual Men," American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 173-181.
11. Mayerson, P. and Lief, H. "Psychotherapy of Homosexuals: A Follow-Up Study," in Sexual Inversion: The Multiple Roots of Homosexuality, J. Marmor, ed.,
(New York: Basic Books, 1965).
12. Bieber, I. , et al., Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals, (New York: Basic Books, 1962).
13. Ellis, A., "Effectiveness of Psychotherapy with Individuals Who Have Severe Homosexual Problems," Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20, 191-195.
14. Ross, M. and Mendelsohn, F., "Homosexuality in College," AMA Archives of Neurological Psychiatry, 80, 253-263.
15. Monroe , R. and Enelow, M., "Ihe Therapeutic Motivation in Male Homosexuality," American Journal of Psychotherapy, 14,
474-490.
16. van den Aardweg, G., On the Origins and Treatment of Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Reinterpretation. (Westport, CT: Prager, 1986).
17. Nicolosi, J., Reparative Therapy ofthe Male Homosexual. (Northvale, N.J.:Aronson, 1991).
18 Nicolosi, J. and Freeman, L., Healing Homosexuality. (Northvale, N.J.: Aronson, 1995).
19. Spitzer, R 200 Subjects Who Claim to Have Changed Their Sexual Orientation From Homosexual to Heterosexual. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of
The American Psychiatric Association, May, 2001.
20. Sell, T., et al., "The Prevalence of Homosexual Behavior and Attraction in the U.S. , the UK and France : Results from National Population-Based Samples,"
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1995,235-248.
21. US Census, 2000, Table PET14. (7,386 households out of 1,301,670).
22. Byne, W. and Parsons, B. "Human Sexual Orientation: The Biological Theories Reappraised," Archives of General Psychiatry, 1993, 407-409.
23. Billings , P. and Beckwith, J. Technology Review, July, 1993, 60.
24. Byne, W., "The Biological Evidence Challenged," Scientific American, May, 1994,50-55.
25. American Academy of Pediatrics, "Technical Report -Policy Statement on Adoption by Same-Sex Parents", Pediatrics, Feb., 2002.
261 Cramer, D. "Gay Parents and Their Children: A Review of Research and Practical lmplications," Journal of Counselling and Development, April 1986, 506.
27. Bozett, F., Gay Fathers: A Review of the Literature, Homosexuality and the Family, (New York: Harrington Park Press, 1989), 52.
28. McLanahan, S. and Sandfeur, G.. Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994), 45.
29. Fagan, P. "How Broken Families Rob Children of Their Chance for Prosperity," Heritage Foundation Badcgounder, June 11, 1999 , 13.
30. Upchurc h, D., et al., Gender and Ethnic Differences in the Timing of First Sexual Intercourse," Family Planning Perspectives, 1998,121-124
31. Hilton, J. and Devall, E., "Comparison of Parenting and Children's Behavior in Single-Mother, Single-Father and Intact Families," Journal of Divorce and
Remarriage, 1998,23-54.
32. Mauldon, J., "The Effect of Marital Disruption on Children's Health," Demography, 1990, 431-446.
33. Furstenberg, F., et al., "Reconsidering the Effects of Marital Disruption: What Happens to Children of Divorce in Early Adulthood?" Journal of Family Issues,
June, 1994.
34. Thomso n, E., et al., "Family Structure and Child Well-Being; Economic Resources vs. Parental Behaviors," Social Forces, 1994,221-242.
35. Sarantakos, S. "Children in Three Contexts: Family, Education, and Social Development," Children Australia , vol. 21, 1996, 29.
36. Waite, LL and Gallagher, M., The Case for Marriage (New York: Double Day, 1992).
37. Naval, D., et al., Why Marriage Matters: 21 Conclusions From the Social Sciences ( New York : Institute for American Values, 2002).
38. Blankenhom, D., Fatherless America (New York: Basic Books, 1995), 219.
39. Popenoe, D., Life Without Father, ( Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 19961144,146.
40. Fagan, P. op. cil
41. "The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect", U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 1996, xviii
42. Dawson , D. Family Structure and Children's' Health and Well-Being; Data From the 1988 National Health Interview Survey on Child Health," Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 1991, 573-584
43. Harper, C. and McLanahan, S. "Father Absence in Youth Incarceration," Paper at the 1998 Annual Meeting ofthe American Sociological Association, San
Francisco.
44. Pollack, M., "Male Homosexuality," in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, Aries, P. and Bejin, A., eds., ( New York : B. Blackwell,
1985), 40-61
45. Saghir, M. and Robins, E., Male and Female Homosexuality (Baltimore: Williams and Wilki ns, 1973), 225.
46. Bell , A and Weinberg, M. Homosexualities: A Study in Diversity Among Men and Women (New York: Simon and Sc huster, 1978), 308, 309.
47. Wiederman, M., "Extramarital Sex: Prevalence and Correlates in a National Survey," Journal of Sex Research, 1997, 170.
48. Cle eats, M., "Sex in America Today: A New National Survey Reveals How our Attitudes are Changing" Parade, Augud t 7, 1994, 4.6.
49. Coxon, A., d al., "Sex Role Separation in Diaries of Homosexual Men," AIDS, July, 1993, 877-882.
50. Hutchinseo, C., et al., "Characteristics of Patients with Syphilis Attending Baltimore STD Clinics," Archives of Internal Medicine, 1991, 511-516.
51. Hart, G., et al., "Risk Behavior, Anti-HIV and Anti-Hepatitis B Core Prevalence in Clinic and Non-clinic Samples of Gay Men in England , 1991-1992," AIDS,
July, 1993,863-869.
52. Lockhar, L, et al., "Letting Out the Secret: Violence in Lesbian Relationships," Journal of Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1994, 469-492.
53. Herrell, R., "A Co-Twin Study in Adult Men," Archives of General Psychiatry, 1999,867-874.
54. Straffer, J., et al., "Suicide," Life Threatening Behavior, 1995, 6471.
55. Hall, J., "Lesbians Recovering from Alcoholic Problems: An Ethnographic Study of Health Care Expectation," Nursing Research, 1994,238-244.
56. Erickson, K, and Trodci, K, "Sex, Alcohol and Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A National Survey," Family Planning Perspectives, Dec., 1994, 26 1.
57. Tasker, F., and Golombok, S., "Adults Raised as Children in Lesbian Families," Developmental Psychology, 1995, 213.
58. see "AIDS and Sexual Behavior in France ," Nature, 1992, 407-409; Bailey, J., at al., "Sexual Orientation of Adult Sons of Gay Fathers," Developmental
Psychology, 1995,124129; Billy, J., et al., "Ile Sexual Behavior of Men in the US ," Family Planning Perspectives, 1993, 52-60; and Johnson, A., et al.,
"Sexual Lifestyles and HIV Risk," Nature, 1992, 410-412.
59. Golombok, S. and Tasker, F., "Do Parents Influence the Sexual Orientation of Their Children? Findings from a Longitudinal Study of Lesbian Families,"
Developmental Psychology, 1996, 7.
60. Paul, D., 1986 study cited in Patterso n, C., "Children of Lesbian and Gay Parents," Marriage and Family Review, 1989,177-196.  f

Page 4
61. Bozet, F., 1987 study cited in Paumson, C., ibid.
62. Stacey and Biblarz, "Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?" American Sociological Review, 2001, 174, 179.
63. Green, R., dd al., "Lesbian Mothers and Their Children: A Comparison with Solo Parent Heterosexual Mothers and Their Children," Archives of Sexual Behavior,
1986, 167-184.
64. Cameron, P. and Cameron, K., "Homosexual Parents," Adolescence, 1996, 772.
65. Cameron, P. and Cameron, K., Psychological Reports, 1995, 611-621.
66. Hogg, R., et al., "Modelingthe Impact of HIV Disease on Mortality in Gay and Bisexual Men," International Journal of Epidemiology, 1997,657.

ACTUAL TELEVISED INCIDENT OF NEGATIVE SOCIOLOGICAL RAMIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO CHILDREN OF SAME-SEX PARENTS
              Unfortunately, I cannot get this disturbing broadcast video.
              On a Toronto cutting-edge television station (citytv) channel 57 during spring 2004, there was a live discussion program pertaining to same-sex parents with their kids. In the earlier segment of the show, everything went according to “Politically-Correct Nirvana” until a small child started crying, “Why can’t we have a regular mommy and daddy”? This evoked emotion from other children and the majority of these young innocents started crying in unison. 
              Needless to expound, political-correctness hell broke loose! In fact, one of the program facilitators angrily tried to shut these infants up! So, is passing same-sex marriage legislation worth the insecurity and overall negative well being of these children? Isn't allowance of a same-sex parent’s culture - a violation and hypocrisy of children's rights?

CONCLUDING POSTSCRIPTS & A MORE IMMEDIATE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION TO BE DEALT WITH
              On Friday, November 5, 1999 - A UN High Court ruled against Canada and Ontario pertaining to religious school funding.
              Because of this, a discriminatory dinosaur (1830 Scott Act) should be prioritised for repeal over the same-sex marriage legislation controversy. (The 1830 Scott Act is:..."good ol’ boys", "gun racks", "confederate flag on top of a '52 Ford pickup", "parish-lines", "chawin' tobaccy", "spittoons"). No religion should have special status because of a obsolete 'grandfather clause'. This is another violation of Multiculturalism and Ethnicity.
              As a clarification on this e-mail, I will attach the UN Court Ruling documents for clarification and to be repealed.
              Mr. Prime Minister, I implore you, I beg you - do not pass the controversial same-sex legislation.
              You claimed to have thought about this in your conscience. In light of my lengthy concerns, I respectfully implore you - think harder!
              If same-sex marriage legislation is passed, there will be a spiritual, ethical, economic, and sociological judgement against this great nation that I love and was born in. Venturing into prophecy, it is not unrealistic to surmise that Osama Ben-Laden and Al Qaeda may prioritise terrorism against Canada rather than the U.S. if same-sex marriage is allowed.
              No truer phrase can be said in context of these issues: God created Adam and Eve - not Adam and Steve!             
              I thank you and/or your Assistant for reading my e-mail with attachments.

In all of our mutual best interests,
Mike Researcher
Mike Researcher
coloured leaves